Its me, Franz Glaser, a retired engineer.
These are slim pages for mobile phone visitors of the /pd/ pages.
/pd/ means "Parliamentrary Democracy", my primary goal. You can read here that I don't begin a revolution. All revolutions were started to end in a dictatory.
I try to convince good people about mature citicen behaviour for a responsible and respected democratic republic, a parlamentary democracy without church or military hierarchy and ideology shepherd parties.
from militair's and officer's and jurist's hierarchies!
Ideologies are outdated.
Three powers parliamentary democracy.
Prof. Dr. Hans Kelse is considered the father of the Austrian constitution.
Feudal hierarchy.
The jurists and buerocrats have stolen us the democratic republic B-VG §1
Aphorism ... the silence of good people.
with a job in which they have little responsibility and a low rank.
sketch of a true parliamentary plenum
in a demoratic constitutional state?
is in the minds of mature citicens.
"The winner takes it all" is gambling, not democracy.
Education is accumulated knowledge capital of other people.
when you are interrogated.
Members of Parliament are untouchable.
STACK overflow.
MÜHLVIERTEL, SOUTH OF LEONFELDEN.
MEANWHILE DISTROYED.
FREE THE PARLIAMENT FROM THE MILITARY AND OFFICE LIKE HIERARCHIES
The main difference to the worldwide thousands of powerless and useless parliaments for show, that are all factually not allowed to control the state apparatus (judicatives and executives) with legislative laws from the parliament. I am not happy about the hieararchies in the state apparatus but this is not the point of view here.
I don't fight against the jurists and not against the police. They do their task and their job.
I write here to free the people's parlament from the range- and hiearchy system that was installed into the parlaments and in the constitutions from the beginning by officers, by jurists and by militairs. They could not better because they could not think democratic, they studied law in the emperor era and in the royal era and in the colonial era and in the sowjet era. Their goals were honorable but the times have changed. This was a sandy ground for the tiny plant "parliamentary democracy and three powers system".
directory
THE FOUCAULT PENDULUM KEEPS ITS DIRECTION, THE EARTH BELOW ROTATES.
The political parties are not only just for show to attract voters to the polls. In fact the boss of the party with the PM/cancellor, the same person in both top ranges makes the separation of powers a farce. The elections are useless, a tactical tool only to brake the parlaments power to zero because all MP's must obey the party leader in the government whom they must control as legislatory author with laws and monitor as indirect souvereign and superior. STACK OVERFLOW
Only true PARLIAMENTARY democracy can solve the growing bureaucracy-deadloop. No better party, no better cancellor/PM.theology
In a republic, the executive governments and the judicative courts are employees of the sovereign, in fact of the parliament.
directory
Democracy happens in parliaments
by very intensive, silent discussion.
Elections are the periodic tool for mature soveraign citicens
to create the best indirect parliament.
Greek "democracy" = people's power. Legislative:
The people's parliament writes the laws for ALL. And nobody else. The representatives in parliament have no superiors, not even in a political party. As opposed to the military and the offices and to the judges, they have no different ranges in a democratic parliament: they have no hierachy in the parliament. The hierarchy background of the jurists, who wrote the constitutions and the statutes for the parliament, must be rewritten step by step.
The state power was first combined judicatives and executives together but the judges had range troubles at trials with the executive investigating prosecuters. The troubles were not finished and solved with the judicative power but transported out into the governments and ministreries. The investigating prosecuters felt themselves positioned and ranged too low in the Ministry of the Interior together with the police office. So it was necessary to shift them into a new Ministry of Justice that the Illu-redacteurs simply call "Justice", not differing from the courts.
The executives (their job is to execute the laws) are the government (Ministers and Prime minister) on top of the police officers and of the public prosecures and of the military and of the hospitals and of the universities and of the schools.
The judges and executive officials are highly qualified. But not called to the writing of laws and orders themselves, to the interpretation and modification, which they decide according to as judges and obay as executives.
The constitutional state begins with the decision WHO WRITES THE LAW. In Austrian constitutions paragraph 1 this is fixed by Dr. Hans Kelsen as "Austria is a democratic republic. Its law emanates from the people's." (german: Volk = people's)
Unfortunately the press calls the prosecutors "Justice" and produces royal-imperial misunderstandings, respect and admiration, society- and party formation, continued in the citicen's, the electors minds.
directory
PROF. DR. HANS KELSEN IS CONSIDERED THE FATHER
OF THE NEW REPUBLICAN CONSTITUTION NOT ONLY IN AUSTRIA.
The text in German for your ^C^V Google translator:
Dr. Hans Kelsen
Der VfGH möge die Fraktionsdisziplin der Abgeordneten in den Landtagen und im Nationalrat für verfassungswidrig im Sinn des Artikels 1 der Bundesverfassung erklären:
Österreich ist eine demokratische Republik. Ihr Recht geht vom Volk aus.
It was my dear Brother Josef Glaser who painted this image
„In Stein gemeißelt, in Granit”. Carved in stone, in granite. Granite is the "national stone" in my area „Mühlviertel". We inhabitants are famous to be honest and decent and difficult to convince with lies.
Salzburger Nachrichten (von dieser Zeitung habe ich das Hans Kelsen Portrait verwendet)
The Constitutional Court should declare the party discipline of members of parliament in the state parliaments and the National Council unconstitutional within the meaning of Article 1 of the Federal Constitution:
Austria is a democratic republic. Its law emanates from the people's.
In Vienna the Parliament got a special
There was no cry in the parliament: the party obedient MP's didn't call the Constitutional Court. Btw. This Court was created in the 1920ies by Prof.Dr.Hans Kelsen and came to honor in many other constitutions.
But this court can be called by obedient party MP's only: the jurists built this trap into the constitution in the 1920ies. To disempower the people's parliament.
For example, the legislative parliamentary and the parties statutes must be approved by executive government authoriries and constantly monitored. This throws the authority of people's parliament into the trash. Election campaigns don't even mention that, its constitution, Holy Inquisition. No Jot.
The party discipline aka fraction discipline aka club discipline is indeed an enemy of the separation of powers and it is the KILLER of the parliamentary democracy but it is usual and never prosecuted by the criminal police and never punished worldwide.
Because the executives constantly feel the parliament to be their enemy. Even if there are in all parliaments worldwide more than 50% executives as MP's.
This is why I write for more PARLAMENTARY DEMOCRACY with members of the parliament who were selected by mature citicens personally with more than 1 vote (my suggestion is 5 votes for each person) for different jobs and locations and family situations.
Not sqeezed into a ideologic "political party" pot that is a career company but not interested in parlamentary democracy but how to get a position in the government. "Above" the parliament.
The Austrian Federal Constitution is often called the "beautiful Kelsen constitution" but it is only beautiful in the paragraph one (in Austria named „B-VG Artikel 1”). The following paragraphs contradict the paragraph 1.
directory
Thinking in legal terms is very similar to theology.
Including some kind of isolated nobelity.
The castellan has not learned for more than 100 years, that in a republic his LORD is the peoples and their parliament.
It's a slew of questions of authority, relationships and ranks, interpretations of concepts, and dangerous slippery slopes.
During the Holy Inquisition, everything was even more logical: not a jot.
Today, there's an absurd race between bureaucrats to set insidious traps for each other and even more for the working people.
And the MP's, the controllers of the "state apparatus", are kept in chains by party and buerocratic hierarchy in people's parliament.
After WW1 the thinking in religios terms, in social and patriotic terms and therefore in opposed ideologic terms was usual. Nazi era, which twisted the imposed will of the victorial governments to even more nonsense, but was "logical", was inevitable.
In Germany and Austria, the 1920 revolution after lost WW1, swapped powers so that the state apparatus, the government and the courts, could no longer retroactively rewrite the laws they were required to obey and to accept for decisions in a monarchical manner. Separaration of powers is the primary principle of a democratic republic as written in § 1 („Artikel 1") of the Austrian constitution. That must inhibit, that the executives and the judges can write the law, which they must obey, possibly retro.
The German traffic light government failed, quite typically, because leading party officials in the governement were supposed to discuss and write the budget. However, the budget is fundamentally a matter for the legislature, for parliament. Best for the WHOLE parliament, not for partisan, party-boss-obeying corrupt antiparliament MP's.
In Western Europe the republics did not work. In Northern Europe and in the colonial states GB, NL, BE, in dictatorial Spain and Portugal, the kingdoms and non-replics were still active with some democratic brighten-ups. Italy was Mafia. In France the king is renamed to President too and elected by one-person-votes. In the Eastern European states, this revolutionary, parliamentary democracy was delayed by marxism until 1990 but is actually re-revolutioned by Stalinists.
Unfortunately, even in 1920, the power-hungry jurists were unwilling to relinquish their accustomed imperial power and stole the Legislative power from the people's parliament under the 1920 constitution: ministerial officials continue to write the law and have it rubber-stamped in the plenary sessions by obedient but corrupt party members.
directory
The actual situation
is the result of 100 til 200 years
of worldwide missing of parliamentary democracy.
The constitutions were written after a won or a lost war
by former emperial jurists and military officers.
This is the goal, that I am looking for:
Separation of powers.
Three powers principle.
Democracy happens in parliaments.
Only laws that have been conceived, debated,
and drafted in Parliament become valid.
The outdated 51% majority vote must give way to a whole.
MP's have no superiors. No statutes written by externals.
So my text is a very raw suggestion only.
This doesn't concern the defense ministers, the interior ministers, or the justice ministers.
