/pd/pd8.html
https only - NO COOKIES. No dialogs, read only.
. red/white/red = flag of Austria .
careful
Its me, Franz Glaser, a retired engineer.
These are slim pages for mobile phone visitors of the /pd/ pages.

/pd/ means "Parliamentrary Democracy", my primary goal. You can read here that I don't begin a revolution. All revolutions were started to end in a dictatory.

I try to convince good people about mature citicen behaviour for a responsible and respected democratic republic, a parlamentary democracy without church or military hierarchy and ideology shepherd parties.

directory:
RESCUE the parliaments
from militair's and officer's and jurist's hierarchies!
FOUCAULT pendulum.
Ideologies are outdated.
SEPARATION OF POWERS
Three powers parliamentary democracy.
KELSEN constitution.
Prof. Dr. Hans Kelse is considered the father of the Austrian constitution.
JURA IS THEOLOGY
Feudal hierarchy.
OVER 100 YEARS LOST THE REVOLUTION 1920
The jurists and buerocrats have stolen us the democratic republic B-VG §1
NAPOLEON
Aphorism ... the silence of good people.
MOST PEOPLE ARE HAPPY...
with a job in which they have little responsibility and a low rank.
PROBLEM-ANALYSIS ... DISCUSSIONS ... SOLUTION
sketch of a true parliamentary plenum
WHO WRITES the law
in a demoratic constitutional state?
PEOPLE'S POWER aka democracy
is in the minds of mature citicens.
NO 51/49% MAJORITY VOTES
"The winner takes it all" is gambling, not democracy.
ÈDUCATION OBLIGE
Education is accumulated knowledge capital of other people.
DON'T ASK YOURSELF
when you are interrogated.
UNTOUCHABLES
Members of Parliament are untouchable.

MÜHLVIERTEL, SOUTH OF LEONFELDEN.
MEANWHILE DISTROYED.
kmeanwin kmaeande

FREE THE PARLIAMENT FROM THE MILITARY AND OFFICE LIKE HIERARCHIES

The main difference to the worldwide thousands of powerless and useless parliaments for show, that are all factually not allowed to control the state apparatus (judicatives and executives) with legislative laws from the parliament. I am not happy about the hieararchies in the state apparatus but this is not the point of view here.

I don't fight against the jurists and not against the police. They do their task and their job.

I write here to free the people's parlament from the range- and hiearchy system that was installed into the parlaments and in the constitutions from the beginning by officers, by jurists and by militairs. They could not better because they could not think democratic, they studied law in the emperor era and in the royal era and in the colonial era and in the sowjet era. Their goals were honorable but the times have changed. This was a sandy ground for the tiny plant "parliamentary democracy and three powers system".
directory

THE FOUCAULT PENDULUM KEEPS ITS DIRECTION, THE EARTH BELOW ROTATES.

pendel640x450

The political parties are not only just for show to attract voters to the polls. In fact the boss of the party with the PM/cancellor, the same person in both top ranges makes the separation of powers a farce. The elections are useless, a tactical tool only to brake the parlaments power to zero because all MP's must obey the party leader in the government whom they must control as legislatory author with laws and monitor as indirect souvereign and superior. STACK OVERFLOW

Only true PARLIAMENTARY democracy can solve the growing bureaucracy-deadloop. No better party, no better cancellor/PM.theology

In a republic, the executive governments and the judicative courts are employees of the sovereign, in fact of the parliament.
directory

Democracy happens in parliaments
by very intensive, silent discussion.

Elections are the periodic tool for mature soveraign citicens
to create the best indirect parliament.

drei_maechte-EN

Greek "democracy" = people's power. Legislative:
The people's parliament writes the laws for ALL. And nobody else. The representatives in parliament have no superiors, not even in a political party. As opposed to the military and the offices and to the judges, they have no different ranges in a democratic parliament: they have no hierachy in the parliament. The hierarchy background of the jurists, who wrote the constitutions and the statutes for the parliament, must be rewritten step by step.

The state power was first combined judicatives and executives together but the judges had range troubles at trials with the executive investigating prosecuters. The troubles were not finished and solved with the judicative power but transported out into the governments and ministreries. The investigating prosecuters felt themselves positioned and ranged too low in the Ministry of the Interior together with the police office. So it was necessary to shift them into a new Ministry of Justice that the Illu-redacteurs simply call "Justice", not differing from the courts.

The executives (their job is to execute the laws) are the government (Ministers and Prime minister) on top of the police officers and of the public prosecures and of the military and of the hospitals and of the universities and of the schools.

The judges and executive officials are highly qualified. But not called to the writing of laws and orders themselves, to the interpretation and modification, which they decide according to as judges and obay as executives.

The constitutional state begins with the decision WHO WRITES THE LAW. In Austrian constitutions paragraph 1 this is fixed by Dr. Hans Kelsen as "Austria is a democratic republic. Its law emanates from the people's." (german: Volk = people's)

Unfortunately the press calls the prosecutors "Justice" and produces royal-imperial misunderstandings, respect and admiration, society- and party formation, continued in the citicen's, the electors minds.

directory

PROF. DR. HANS KELSEN IS CONSIDERED THE FATHER
OF THE NEW REPUBLICAN CONSTITUTION NOT ONLY IN AUSTRIA.
drhanskelsen_vfgh.jpg

The text in German for your ^C^V Google translator:
Dr. Hans Kelsen
Der VfGH möge die Fraktionsdisziplin der Abgeordneten in den Landtagen und im Nationalrat für verfassungswidrig im Sinn des Artikels 1 der Bundesverfassung erklären:
Österreich ist eine demokratische Republik. Ihr Recht geht vom Volk aus.

It was my dear Brother Josef Glaser who painted this image
„In Stein gemeißelt, in Granit”. Carved in stone, in granite. Granite is the "national stone" in my area „Mühlviertel". We inhabitants are famous to be honest and decent and difficult to convince with lies.

drhanskelsen_vfgh.jpg

Salzburger Nachrichten (von dieser Zeitung habe ich das Hans Kelsen Portrait verwendet)

The Constitutional Court should declare the party discipline of members of parliament in the state parliaments and the National Council unconstitutional within the meaning of Article 1 of the Federal Constitution:
Austria is a democratic republic. Its law emanates from the people's.

In Vienna the Parliament got a special
Ministry for the constitution
put in front of its nose by the governmental executive jurists.

There was no cry in the parliament: the party obedient MP's didn't call the Constitutional Court. Btw. This Court was created in the 1920ies by Prof.Dr.Hans Kelsen and came to honor in many other constitutions.

But this court can be called by obedient party MP's only: the jurists built this trap into the constitution in the 1920ies. To disempower the people's parliament.

For example, the legislative parliamentary and the parties statutes must be approved by executive government authoriries and constantly monitored. This throws the authority of people's parliament into the trash. Election campaigns don't even mention that, its constitution, Holy Inquisition. No Jot.

blanka_baby640x535.jpg

The party discipline aka fraction discipline aka club discipline is indeed an enemy of the separation of powers and it is the KILLER of the parliamentary democracy but it is usual and never prosecuted by the criminal police and never punished worldwide.

uselessw2_640_400.jpg

Because the executives constantly feel the parliament to be their enemy. Even if there are in all parliaments worldwide more than 50% executives as MP's.

This is why I write for more PARLAMENTARY DEMOCRACY with members of the parliament who were selected by mature citicens personally with more than 1 vote (my suggestion is 5 votes for each person) for different jobs and locations and family situations.

Not sqeezed into a ideologic "political party" pot that is a career company but not interested in parlamentary democracy but how to get a position in the government. "Above" the parliament.

The Austrian Federal Constitution is often called the "beautiful Kelsen constitution" but it is only beautiful in the paragraph one (in Austria named „B-VG Artikel 1”). The following paragraphs contradict the paragraph 1.

directory

Thinking in legal terms is very similar to theology.
Including some kind of isolated nobelity.

BURGVOGTEN

The castellan has not learned for more than 100 years, that in a republic his LORD is the peoples and their parliament.

It's a slew of questions of authority, relationships and ranks, interpretations of concepts, and dangerous slippery slopes.
During the Holy Inquisition, everything was even more logical: not a jot.
Today, there's an absurd race between bureaucrats to set insidious traps for each other and even more for the working people.

And the MP's, the controllers of the "state apparatus", are kept in chains by party and buerocratic hierarchy in people's parliament.

After WW1 the thinking in religios terms, in social and patriotic terms and therefore in opposed ideologic terms was usual. Nazi era, which twisted the imposed will of the victorial governments to even more nonsense, but was "logical", was inevitable.

In Germany and Austria, the 1920 revolution after lost WW1, swapped powers so that the state apparatus, the government and the courts, could no longer retroactively rewrite the laws they were required to obey and to accept for decisions in a monarchical manner. Separaration of powers is the primary principle of a democratic republic as written in § 1 („Artikel 1") of the Austrian constitution. That must inhibit, that the executives and the judges can write the law, which they must obey, possibly retro.

The German traffic light government failed, quite typically, because leading party officials in the governement were supposed to discuss and write the budget. However, the budget is fundamentally a matter for the legislature, for parliament. Best for the WHOLE parliament, not for partisan, party-boss-obeying corrupt antiparliament MP's.

In Western Europe the republics did not work. In Northern Europe and in the colonial states GB, NL, BE, in dictatorial Spain and Portugal, the kingdoms and non-replics were still active with some democratic brighten-ups. Italy was Mafia. In France the king is renamed to President too and elected by one-person-votes. In the Eastern European states, this revolutionary, parliamentary democracy was delayed by marxism until 1990 but is actually re-revolutioned by Stalinists.

Unfortunately, even in 1920, the power-hungry jurists were unwilling to relinquish their accustomed imperial power and stole the Legislative power from the people's parliament under the 1920 constitution: ministerial officials continue to write the law and have it rubber-stamped in the plenary sessions by obedient but corrupt party members.

directory

The actual situation
is the result of 100 til 200 years
of worldwide missing of parliamentary democracy.
The constitutions were written after a won or a lost war
by former emperial jurists and military officers.

This is the goal, that I am looking for:
Separation of powers.
Three powers principle.
Democracy happens in parliaments.
Only laws that have been conceived, debated,
and drafted in Parliament become valid.
The outdated 51% majority vote must give way to a whole.
MP's have no superiors. No statutes written by externals.

So my text is a very raw suggestion only.

drei_en
TNparlieament.jpg
NO EXECUTIVE ORDERS!
Parliament = democracy = people's Sovereign's power.
So that all power does not lie in the hands of a president and his government, at least the writing of generally applicable laws and orders must be granted republicanly to the electet, indirect parliament of the people.

This is called "separation of powers" against the monarchy. The government and the officials make fun of it.
TNhierarchie.jpg
HIERARCHY only in state apparatus
The state (called by media and self definition), here "the state apparatus" is still organized hierachical-royal-military-ranged. Its power is combined as Judicative and Executive where we citicens are in range zero.

The Judicatives, the judges decide according to the laws. The balance is the symbol of the Judicative.

The Executives which I painted as an orchestra of highly qualified and synchroneous playing musicians, that was written by a composer somewhere sometime. The executive President, his government and its bureaucracy administer and investigate while obeying the law.

The handcuffs are the symbol of the executives. The conductor directs a particular concert but never writes laws to conduct the music and to hear the music by the auditroy. When other conductors follow him it is not a law for the auditory.
directory

The world suffers a lot.
Not because the violence of bad people.
But the silence of good people.

Napolean Bonaparte

napoleon_silence638.jpg

THE PURPOSE AND TASK OF FOUNDING
POLITICAL PARTIES WAS NEVER
A PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY
BUT RATHER THE "DIVIDE ET IMPERA"
OF THE PEOPLE AND THE
INCITEMENT AGAINST EACH OTHER.


This is not directed against a parricular party but against the artificial matter-of-factness of the ideological stable orderin the minds of voters, as we were "educated" by the authorities as sheep to be counted and assigned into their stables.

The jurists did not invent that, they simply copied the situation from the churches. It was not necessary to educate us people, we were already trained since thousands of years. As subordinates, even as soldiers.

Our submissive, subtle basic behaviour is evolutionary, not guilty. That's true in civil living and for office activity.

The jurists, who wrote the constitutions have also oriented themselves towards their higher position but their first driving force was their sense of responsibility for their state. The duty of their position. Unfortunately these jurists can't imagine that an entrepreneur thinks the same for the company.

Nevertheless, the separation of powers takes precedence in the democratic republic. The sense of duty of senior executive officials is the norm.


directory

REPUBLIC AND DEMOCRACY ARE
INCOMPATIBLE WITH A
HIERARCHY AND WITH RANKS.

VOTERS WHO ELECT THE PRIME MINISTER
AS A LEADER INSTEAD THEIR MP REPRESENTATIVE
ARE SHEEP WHO ELECT THEIR BUTCHER.


pagode_heidi_schade_mainz.jpg

Thousands of years of education in civic obedience, in subservience to authority, perhaps even divinely appointed, has become genetically ingrained in us, homo sapiens.

In contrast, attempts to "scientifically" combat this with even more stupid ideologies on behalf of the state are a waste of time.

The state apparatus, the government, is a perpetrator with a one-sided interest. Nothing is neutral there, neither the judiciary nor the executive, and certainly not the legislature, which has been stolen in the constitution by the executives, by the jurists.

There is no method to change or re-educate the established authorities. Only a strong parliament, one that doesn't allow itself to be led by the nose by party leaders, can impose the will of the people on those greedy for power.

And this has been enshrined in the Austrian constitution since 1920. We voters are to blame for not taking advantage of this, but instead allowing ourselves to be incited against one another like stupid children by idolizing candidates for chancellor.

directory

"WE HAVE ALREADY ARRESTED SIX PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE."
THE PEOPLE TRULY RESPONSIBLE HAVEN'T PREVENTED ANYTHING.
THEY CAN ONLY PUNISH ACCORDING TO LAWS THAT THEY WROTE THEMSELVES.

arrested

arrested.jpg

directory

PROBLEM - ANALYSIS -
SUGGESTIONS - DISCUSSIONS -
BRAINSTORM - SOLUTION.

NO HIERARCHIES, NO RANKS, NO GRADES, NO NOBILITIES.

On the /pd/pages is since several years a text named „Skizze”, engl. "sketch" but in German only.

This is the sketch of a true parliamentary plenum with several different fields of interest for legislature and for MP-specialists and experts out of a political party.

The discussions will run in screen-and-keyboard-forums like in the usenet and in facebook but isolated für MP's only. Each MP may read at each group and theme and may add doubts or ideas to the discussion. Each law may and will be discussed by all MP's, not by 51% until all doubts of the mature and correct citicens are represented, not injured except the criminals.

The text of the new law will grow slowly and all MP's may discuss the text until all MP's are happy. I think about some kind of an internal „parliamentary Wikipedia” with concentrated § knowledge where all MP's can read the rules and the limits of older laws and of EU- and international limitations.

Note: the voting is no longer centralized by a counting or sketching parliamental president in 50/50 majority mode but the MP's discuss on the parliament computer keyboard and screen. Each MP votes Fuzzy scaled, not Y/N. And the computer tells the intermediate results immediately to all MP's so that they can compare themselves with the floating entity.

No permanent election campaign taken place in the House of Lords or Commons at the lectern. And each MP can read the texts of all MP's which (s)he is interested in and can raise concerns about issues that would not be noticed by the experts.

I think of an "entire parliament" instead of 50/50 majority votes but it must not end with Orbán blocking. So my suggiestion is tolerant: if less than 95% voting by the MP's then the new law is valid only for a short period.

SKETCH of a new, legislative parliament plenum:

drei4maechte640x388_EN.jpg

One of the primary "democratic republic" repairs of the actual Dollfuß era constitution is evident: no longer any governments and their officials are allowed to write and to execute laws to control or to investigate the parliamental, the legislative area.

The outdated royal private "administration" courts for the executive federal government and their executive officials, also in the federal states must be instantly finished and closed. There is no position and place for them in the "democratic republic" separation of powers.


For the fist time, for settling in, I suggest to place the ideologic MP's reduced to 1/3 the seats in the plenum. This is not a concession for the ideological party officials but for the new masters, the voters. There are experts also in the couple of ideolocic MP's but these must be inhibited to build a governmental crew, a coalition.like now.

I suggest to fill the seats in the plenum according to the voter turnout and valid votes.

Prof.Dr.Hans Kelsen was against the Federal President and against the ideologic parties and against the executive legislature (eg. B-VG Art. 18 2-5). But the in the imperial period educated, royal oriented and externally controlled jurists did not listen to him. The medial eye slit on the party leaders and the state- and government leaders makes the parliaments to quantités négligeables. sovereign, in fact of the parliament.
directory


CONSTITUTONAL STATE (German: „Rechtsstaat”) means first: WHO WRITES THE LAW.

legislative22-EN.jpg

In a parliamentary democracy aka separation of powers it is the people's parliament, who writes the law. Note that I write "who", not "that".

No hierarchy in people's parliament! Nkonglomerat.jpg
Laws coming out of the parliament must not be directed by a hiearchy but discussed by marble-type, even ranged and periodically directly elected MP's with high responsibility and expertise.

The legislative parliament has, as a whole, as a unity, the highest range about the civil servants. The civil servants who, in a republic, serve the people (the Souvereign) every day in their hierarchic judicative and the executive powers.

Government proposals are not accepted but the government and the courts may send a few equally ranged MP's into the plenum as discussion partners eg. "security" and "taxes" and "university+school" etc. but less than 20% in the plenum. They have too much influence in the §-universities and in the media.

Political parties are bouncing doormen for the citicens at their way to their democracy. They deliver no practical advantage for the people except a lot of blabla for the newspaper comments and for the TV stations. But the laws are written since 100 until 500 years for the state apparatus with exponential screw up bureaucracy.

tuersteher640235

The government and office executive shall be totally non-partisan. The government, the ministers and the prime minister /cancellor shall be high range qualified officials to be the respected superiors of the executive range. Not an "experts" government but an "office range" government without political parties is the solution against the exponential buraucracy growth.

The chambers (wage labor, trade and crafts, medical) must be represented as experts in the plenum, not as ideologic parties! No, the ideologic parties are not democratic and not social and not patriotic and not christian. They are hierarchic and externally and foreign controlled.

pic/dreimaechte.jpg

The laws, which are the results of the discussions of tolerant MP's, are oriented on the people's demands and interests AND on the good executability AND on good decisions in the courts. Not only as now usual and screwing up the bureaucracy and the police-state even in the hospitals and in the elementary schools. No marble discussing MP can become a Prime Minister / Cancellor or Minister or State Secretary.
pic/gehorsam_macht_schuldig640x560.jpg
PHRASES (from concentration camps):
"Obedience makes one to become a complice"
"Working makes one free"
Look at the famous upside down B at Auschwitz Birkenau.
directory


THE IDEOLOGIC POLITICAL PARTIES
ARE TOTALLY NAILED
INTO THE PEOPLE'S MINDS
AS PRIMARY REQUIREMENT FOR THE
PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY.

WHAT ELSE?
HOW ELSE TO COUNT THE 50/50 MAJORITY?

The constitution jurists installed the
DIVIDE ET IMPERA parties and the 50/50 mode
to make people's parliament obedient.

Haider, Schüssel, Kurz, Orbán,
Trump, Putin ++ in governments
and simultaneous party leaders
but obedient in their lodge
are intermediate results.

pic/politicians.jpg


Text for copy and paste ^C^V into a translator:

For how many citicens and voters
is "political" the same as "party political"?

No matter if an MP or as an officer
on an executive government job.

Even no matter if (s)he is still active or already
retired = The political party sticks to her / him.

At least that remains secret,
even though it is much more powerful
than political parties in the states
and unfortunatey in the parliaments.
pic/whole.jpg

Democracy
means the POWER OF THE PEOPLE.
NOT A PARTITION OF THE PEOPLE AND
NOT A 51% GOVERNMENT COALITION OF POLITICAL PARTIES.

On top there is no people, on top is lust for power and greed for money.
Young people are reduced to capitalists in this matter.

Democracy means indirect, continuous,
parlamentary discussion by experts
to achieve a legal compromise
for the whole people
except criminals.

Democracy doesn't come from the government, and even less from party leaders.
Both are merely beneficiaries, free riders of the democratic selection mechanisms.

The worst are the law universities and business schools, which train our managers and, even more so, our business journalists to left wing Marxist and / or right wing patriotic expert idiots.

directory

WHEN EVERYTHING STAYS THE SAME
NOTHING WILL EVER CHANGE.

THIS IS TODAY'S PARLIAMENT'S SITUATION
WITH PARTY AND COALITION
WITH TOTAL GOVERNMENT POWER OVER
THE PARLIAMENT.

NO SEPARATION OF POWERS,
NO PARLAMENTARY DEMOCRACY

pic/whole640480.jpg
51/49% majority increases the government power to 100.00%
and reduces the opposition to 00.00%


The winner takes it all, the losers are ignored. Democracy is different.

Unfortunately, all journalists are too coward to position themselves against the "executive order" activities by the legislative exercising governmental executive politicians in their commentaries.

They write reverently about "president" and "heads of state" and "government" but hardly mention the democratic work in parliaments.

Add the too many and to school teaching comments instead of informative news. I read the news articles as food to build my own cemments. And I am alergic against zensoring and top down rules.


"GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES HAVE
GIVEN THEMSELVES THE PERMISSION
BY EXECUTIVE ORDER TO DECLARE
ALL CITICENS, WHOMEVER THEY LIKE,
AS A PROBABLE TERRORIST."
pic/schnueffeln640_480.jpg
TNhacker.jpg This doesn't concern the defense ministers, the interior ministers, or the justice ministers.

They blithely write laws that benefit their authority hieararchy officials but make life difficult and expensive for us citizens. The coalition party MPs obediently nod along to this madness.

President Trump, the great executive legislator, has taken the evil habit of "executive orders" to the extreme. The power and approval of his voters prove that parliamentary democracy has never been more than a campaign slogan, even in the United States.

You are right, that there are a couple of states with similar presidents and governments all over "terra" who and which use the authoritive executive legislature extensively. But these are called dictatories, not democratic role models.
WHENEVER EXECUTIVE ORDERS
ARE ESSENTIAL, EG. IN WAR,
THE PARLIAMENT MUST STOP ITS
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITY TEMPORARILY
AND CONCENTRATRATE ALL ATTENTION
TO THE LAW-ABIDING ACTIVITY
OF THE EXECUTIVES.

directory

ALL THE HUMANS ARE EQUAL.
EQUAL IN RIGHTS.
BUT NOT EQUAL IN BEHAVIOUR,
NOT EQUAL IN ABILITIES
AND NOT EQUAL IN ATTRACTIVITY.

pic/education_oblige.jpg

In a democratic republic all humans are equal in rights but éducation oblige.

In a democratic republic there must not exist any nobility but adequate ranges have been overtaken from the past royal history in judicative and executive state hierarchies, in universities and in hospitals and in courts.

Its hard for an investigating officer wirh low range to keep calm at a rough situation but this is not the situation that I write about here. Here I write about a high range and highly educated investigating medical or juridical academic inquisitor, who asks an inventor, a constructor, a creative one.

This are persons on another continent at anoher century. The investigator has no problem with possible or even probably wrong lawtexts - they are valid for him, he is not responsible. The creative one works and lives always with probably wrong assumptions on his own risk.
pic/neueerkenntnisse_EN.jpg
Anyway - I dislike the habit of magazines even in the science era to use famous scientist's names and faces as slogan for even great discoveries, eg. "Einstein" for the RT and "the cat" for Schrödinger.

As a result it happened in a discussion, that I got the reproach that I am not allowed as a non academic to quote Max Planck. Anyway - the formula above is highly relevant for me as a radio amateur.
OE5FGL (actually QRT)

NEVER ANSWER QUETIONS,
WHICH A DOCTOR, A JUDGE,
A TEACHER, AN OFFICER
DID NOT EXPLICITLY ASK YOU.

never_answer_EN_640x415.jpg
THAT WILL BE AWKWARDLY USED AGAINST YOU.

This is a friendly recommendation only.
From many years of experience.


directory

ONE OF THE HIGHEST PRINCIPLES
OF THE PARLIAMENTARY POWER
ARE THE UNTOUCHABLE MP's.
ALL REPRESENTATIVES.


keinevorgesetzten_EN.jpg


In Parliament,
there must be no hierarchies
like those found in
bureaucracies and
in political parties!

Members of Parliament duscuss matters equally
and tolerantly in the party and take account
the concerns of minorities.

Members of Parliament have no ssuperiors.
Neither in the party, nor in the church,
nor in the lodge.

directory


pd7.html